# A scale tool issue

**URL:** https://discourse.paraview.org/t/a-scale-tool-issue/6801
**Category:** ParaView Support
**Created:** [March 25, 2021, 11:19pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/a-scale-tool-issue/6801 "2021-03-25T23:19:10Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![oota](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/oota/32/6300_2.png) [@oota](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/oota)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2021, 11:19pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/a-scale-tool-issue/6801/1 "2021-03-25T23:19:10Z")

</div>

When I import a 182 X 113 image to Paraview, the scale tool shows slightly different figures (by one pixel?):

 ![Scaling](https://discourse.paraview.org/uploads/default/original/2X/c/cf927c6a99e8f68e3dc998f7038f43fcb04708e3.png)

Can I have your comments on this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jourdain](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/jourdain/32/11_2.png) [@jourdain](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/jourdain)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2021, 11:36pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/a-scale-tool-issue/6801/2 "2021-03-25T23:36:04Z")

</div>

[Inconsistent pixel location from imagedata vs polydata · Issue #1553 · Kitware/vtk-js · GitHub](https://github.com/Kitware/vtk-js/issues/1553) should cover the explanation

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![oota](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/oota/32/6300_2.png) [@oota](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/oota)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2021, 2:33am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/a-scale-tool-issue/6801/3 "2021-03-26T02:33:28Z")

</div>

Thank you for your comments. It’s very helpful. 😀