# diameter of bubbles displayed using glyph
**URL:** https://discourse.paraview.org/t/diameter-of-bubbles-displayed-using-glyph/14320
**Category:** ParaView Support
**Created:** [April 2, 2024, 1:54pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/diameter-of-bubbles-displayed-using-glyph/14320 "2024-04-02T13:54:26Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@otaolafr](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/otaolafr)
#### Post date: [April 2, 2024, 1:54pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/diameter-of-bubbles-displayed-using-glyph/14320/1 "2024-04-02T13:54:26Z")
Hello,
I have made a representation of a bubblig reactor with lagrangian particles,
for the particles I:
1. extracted them with extract block
2. used glyph with radius=1 and that scales with d field.
the thing is that when I see my representation in paraview, the glyphs are way larger in diameter in comparation to their corresponding ‘d’ field.
in paraview, the limits of my geometry is -0.5 to 0.5 and the maximum d (from the spreadsheet of the glyph filter is 0.00791185)
if I take a screenshot and compare the respective sizes in inkscape, I am getting that for a domain that is 1000 (0.5- (-0.5) scaled) I have particles of 13.9.
what I am missing?
here is the complete script and data: [SamplePerPixels - #3 by otaolafr](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/sampleperpixels/14297/3)
thanks in advance
---
### Author:  [@otaolafr](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/otaolafr)
#### Post date: [April 3, 2024, 11:40am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/diameter-of-bubbles-displayed-using-glyph/14320/2 "2024-04-03T11:40:14Z")
just to answer my own question, it is a scale array to ‘d’ instead of to ‘r’ so in the scale factor we need to put 0.5