\>’ has no member named ‘GetIteratorEnd’
Thanks,
Joe Hennessey
---
### Author:  [@Kenneth\_Moreland](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Kenneth_Moreland)
#### Post date: [January 15, 2020, 7:30pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/error-from-vtkm-in-arrayportaltoiterators-h-when-building-with-paraview-superbuild-for-paraview-5-8-0-rc1/3345/2 "2020-01-15T19:30:29Z")
@robert.maynard Are you familiar with this error?
---
### Author:  [@robert.maynard](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/robert.maynard)
#### Post date: [January 15, 2020, 8:05pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/error-from-vtkm-in-arrayportaltoiterators-h-when-building-with-paraview-superbuild-for-paraview-5-8-0-rc1/3345/3 "2020-01-15T20:05:12Z")
I believe this issue was resolved with [VTK-m MR #1934](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m/merge_requests/1934)
I expect that ParaView needs to update to a newer version VTK that has these changes merged in.
---
### Author:  [@cory.quammen](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/cory.quammen)
#### Post date: [January 15, 2020, 8:10pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/error-from-vtkm-in-arrayportaltoiterators-h-when-building-with-paraview-superbuild-for-paraview-5-8-0-rc1/3345/4 "2020-01-15T20:10:28Z")
VTK itself does not have those VTK-m changes yet. Is there any reason to not update VTK-m in VTK?
---
### Author:  [@joeh](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/joeh)
#### Post date: [January 15, 2020, 8:12pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/error-from-vtkm-in-arrayportaltoiterators-h-when-building-with-paraview-superbuild-for-paraview-5-8-0-rc1/3345/5 "2020-01-15T20:12:59Z")
Robert,
I think that change may have been merged in, and that it still does not work properly.
This is the last commit
- 23 Dec, 2019 1 commit
-
- ([https://gitlab.kitware.com/robertmaynard](https://gitlab.kitware.com/robertmaynard))
[ArrayPortalToIterators now compiles with GCC-4.X](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m/commit/83d4d4e4954d2f4aec489f9a325981cf6aa36f2e)
[Robert Maynard](https://gitlab.kitware.com/robertmaynard) authored 3 weeks ago
83d4d4e4
Changes…
namespace vtkmstd
{
/// Implementation of std::void\_t (C++17):
/// Allows for specialization of class templates based on members of template
/// parameters.
#if defined(VTKM\_GCC) && ( **GNUC** \< 5)
// Due to a defect in the wording (CWG 1558) unused parameters in alias templates
// were not guaranteed to ensure SFINAE, and therefore would consider everything
// to match the ‘true’ side. For VTK-m the only known compiler that implemented
// this defect is GCC \< 5.
template \
struct void\_pack
{
using type = void;
};
template \
using void\_t = typename void\_pack\::type;
#else
template \
using void\_t = void;
#endif
} // end namespace vtkmstd
Thanks,
Joe
---
### Author:  [@robert.maynard](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/robert.maynard)
#### Post date: [January 15, 2020, 8:28pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/error-from-vtkm-in-arrayportaltoiterators-h-when-building-with-paraview-superbuild-for-paraview-5-8-0-rc1/3345/6 "2020-01-15T20:28:39Z")
@joeh I will try to reproduce. I have access to gcc-4.8.5 on RHEL 7.6
---
### Author:  [@robert.maynard](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/robert.maynard)
#### Post date: [January 15, 2020, 9:04pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/error-from-vtkm-in-arrayportaltoiterators-h-when-building-with-paraview-superbuild-for-paraview-5-8-0-rc1/3345/7 "2020-01-15T21:04:21Z")
I can’t think of a reason why we can’t update VTK-m in VTK.
---
### Author:  [@robert.maynard](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/robert.maynard)
#### Post date: [January 16, 2020, 2:00pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/error-from-vtkm-in-arrayportaltoiterators-h-when-building-with-paraview-superbuild-for-paraview-5-8-0-rc1/3345/8 "2020-01-16T14:00:20Z")
@joeh Looking at VTK and I see that it currently is using a version of VTK-m that doesn’t have my GCC 4.8.X fix included. I looked at [https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/tree/master/ThirdParty/vtkm/vtkvtkm](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/tree/master/ThirdParty/vtkm/vtkvtkm) and see that it is using SHA1 [b3082721](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m/tree/b30827215cfbfaae05943699d176ff1ca0e10471) which is before SHA1 [83d4d4e4](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m/commit/83d4d4e4954d2f4aec489f9a325981cf6aa36f2e). I have verified that with these changes VTK does compile with gcc-4.8.5 / RHE 7.6.
The next steps are:
1. Update VTK to use a newer version of VTK-m. You can track the progress of this at: [https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge\_requests/6393](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge_requests/6393)
2. Update ParaView to use this newer version of VTK