# Field map rendering

**URL:** https://discourse.paraview.org/t/field-map-rendering/3798
**Category:** ParaView Support
**Created:** [March 12, 2020, 2:10pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/field-map-rendering/3798 "2020-03-12T14:10:01Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sabrina](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/51bf81/32.png) [@Sabrina](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Sabrina)
#### Post date: [March 12, 2020, 2:10pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/field-map-rendering/3798/1 "2020-03-12T14:10:01Z")

</div>

Dear all,  
I have been using ParaView for visualizing the electric field map (geometry modeled with Gmsh and field solved with Elmerfem). My test case is just parallel disks with a certain voltage inside a box of air. Since the system is cylindrically symmetric I am just interested in seeing the field lines in 2D. For this I slice my cylinder with the homonym filter, plot the potential contour, then use the filter “Gradient of unstructured data set” (to calculate the E field, since what I actually have is the potential), and finally use the stream line tracer filter in the 2D plane that i chose.

Everything looks almost perfect, except for some strange lines originated in both plates, that have no physical meaning, and I don’t know what they are or how to get rid of. (see attached image)

 ![Screenshot 2020-03-12 at 12.51.29](https://discourse.paraview.org/uploads/default/original/2X/0/000d25cb610aa88c1a391211aa94dcc3ffb4b627.jpeg)

Does anyone know what is going on? I appreciate your comments.

Cheers!

Sabrina

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mwestphal](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/mwestphal/32/17_2.png) [@mwestphal](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/mwestphal)
#### Post date: [March 13, 2020, 3:09am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/field-map-rendering/3798/2 "2020-03-13T03:09:11Z")

</div>

Are you using Forward, Backward or both for the streamlines direction ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sabrina](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/51bf81/32.png) [@Sabrina](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Sabrina)
#### Post date: [March 13, 2020, 2:46pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/field-map-rendering/3798/3 "2020-03-13T14:46:34Z")

</div>

Hi Mathieu,

I am using Both directions

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mwestphal](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/mwestphal/32/17_2.png) [@mwestphal](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/mwestphal)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 2:56am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/field-map-rendering/3798/4 "2020-03-16T02:56:44Z")

</div>

Does changing that helps ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sabrina](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/51bf81/32.png) [@Sabrina](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Sabrina)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2020, 9:22am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/field-map-rendering/3798/5 "2020-03-16T09:22:19Z")

</div>

No, it does not. However, changing other parameters such as the integrator type , the step unit, min and max step length changes these lines, but they do not go away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mwestphal](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/mwestphal/32/17_2.png) [@mwestphal](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/mwestphal)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2020, 6:14am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/field-map-rendering/3798/6 "2020-03-18T06:14:03Z")

</div>

Could you share an example dataset ?
