# paraview.qch not found

**URL:** https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376
**Category:** ParaView Support
**Tags:** vtk
**Created:** [March 24, 2025, 2:24pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376 "2025-03-24T14:24:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nabilG](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/22d042/32.png) [@nabilG](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/nabilG)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2025, 2:24pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/1 "2025-03-24T14:24:59Z")

</div>

Hi,  
I am trying to compile latest ParaView and hit this issue about one missing `qch` file. I am trying to dig this out, and before in the end switching off the documentation generation, I am wondering whether someone experienced this issue - I am using Qt 5.15.12 which used to work fine with ParaView 5.11.  
Thanks

```auto
         -------
        C:/S/qt/bin/rcc.exe -name paraview_documentation -o C:/S/BUILD/ParaView/Clients/ParaView/Documentation/vtkParaViewDocum
entation_autogen/include_Release/EJRQKI7XPS/qrc_paraview_documentation_CMAKE_.cpp C:/S/BUILD/ParaView/Clients/ParaView/Documentation/paraview_documentation.qrc
         
         Output
         ------
         RCC: Error in 'C:/S/BUILD/ParaView/Clients/ParaView/Documentation/paraview_documentation.qrc': Cannot find file 'C:\S\BUILD\
\ParaView\Clients\ParaView\Documentation\paraview.qch'

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nabilG](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/22d042/32.png) [@nabilG](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/nabilG)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2025, 2:51pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/2 "2025-03-24T14:51:09Z")

</div>

Replying to myself. It seems to be a glitch. A second try resolved the reported issue.  
Presumably I should use fewer processors here (/m)  
Regards.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ben.boeckel](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/ea5d25/32.png) [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [March 24, 2025, 7:11pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/3 "2025-03-24T19:11:16Z")

</div>

This still seems odd…what generator is this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nabilG](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/22d042/32.png) [@nabilG](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/nabilG)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2025, 8:59am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/4 "2025-03-25T08:59:22Z")

</div>

I used `CMAKE_GENERATOR="Visual Studio 15 2017"`. It worked without any trouble on another node which is less powerful  
By the way, do you know who I can contact to unlock my old account and which seems to be locked due to a bug in the approach in use for double authentication ?

> **[@nitawa](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/nitawa/summary)**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ben.boeckel](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/ea5d25/32.png) [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [March 25, 2025, 10:55am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/5 "2025-03-25T10:55:51Z")

</div>

> [@nabilG](#):
>
> I used `CMAKE_GENERATOR="Visual Studio 15 2017"`. It worked without any trouble on another node which is less powerful

The Visual Studio generator isn’t really well-tested, so dependency issues like this might arise. I was unable to reproduce the issue with the `Ninja` generator. I’m not sure what you mean by “powerful” here.

> [@nabilG](#):
>
> By the way, do you know who I can contact to unlock my old account and which seems to be locked due to a bug in the approach in use for double authentication ?

Hmm…not sure, sorry. Is there some kind of admin contact in this account or near the login screen? Failing that, I’ll let our sysadmin team know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nabilG](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/n/22d042/32.png) [@nabilG](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/nabilG)
#### Post date: [March 26, 2025, 1:37pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/6 "2025-03-26T13:37:37Z")

</div>

Sadly  
there is no way to contact some administrator to unlock one account - due to the fact that the two factor authentification as it is implemented is buggy. I don’t get any authentification request on my app or on my email and this is rather frustrating ☹ . Who shall I contact ?  
thanks.

 ![image](https://discourse.paraview.org/uploads/default/original/3X/5/c/5cacaf38659e4b55c77d4ee3ccf43eaf170ac668.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ben.boeckel](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/ea5d25/32.png) [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2025, 2:13pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/7 "2025-03-27T14:13:18Z")

</div>

That is strange. I have 2FA on my account and have had no issues. I’ll let our team know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ben.boeckel](https://discourse.paraview.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/ea5d25/32.png) [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2025, 4:49pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/8 "2025-03-27T16:49:15Z")

</div>

Our sysadmin has disabled 2FA on the other account. Does it work now?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nitawa](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/nitawa/32/17204_2.png) [@nitawa](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/nitawa)
#### Post date: [March 27, 2025, 5:22pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/paraview-qch-not-found/16376/9 "2025-03-27T17:22:52Z")

</div>

It works like a charm!  
Thanks.
