# Problem with Paraview heavy file

**URL:** https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527
**Category:** ParaView Support
**Tags:** vtk
**Created:** [October 9, 2024, 2:03pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527 "2024-10-09T14:03:26Z")
**Posts on this page:** 7
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lola\_Martin\_Alonso](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/lola_martin_alonso/32/15321_2.png) [@Lola\_Martin\_Alonso](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Lola_Martin_Alonso)
#### Post date: [October 9, 2024, 2:03pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527/1 "2024-10-09T14:03:26Z")

</div>

Hi. I have a problem with some .vtk files. The things is that my vtk files have information regarding height. Then if the vtk is smaller than 200,000 KB the visualization is fine, I can see all the volume while if the vtk file is larger it only displays right the information until a point.

Find attached two examples, one with a really big vtk file and the other with a vtk file of 300,000KB. The data is displayed correctly until the same point.

Does anyone have the solution for this?

Thanks a lot community 🙂

 ![image](https://discourse.paraview.org/uploads/default/original/2X/e/eb7b7b9bdf3bc1e1f8e6659021be8e69b8ca70b9.png)  
 ![image](https://discourse.paraview.org/uploads/default/original/2X/c/cb09003f5de9589f24fd68cd8739376fa34f477b.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mwestphal](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/mwestphal/32/17_2.png) [@mwestphal](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/mwestphal)
#### Post date: [October 9, 2024, 2:19pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527/2 "2024-10-09T14:19:48Z")

</div>

please share your data.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Francois\_Mazen](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/francois_mazen/32/6483_2.png) [@Francois\_Mazen](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Francois_Mazen)
#### Post date: [October 10, 2024, 6:29am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527/3 "2024-10-10T06:29:56Z")

</div>

Hi @Lola_Martin_Alonso

It looks like that in the upper part of your dataset, the height\_in\_um field for those points has value of 0. Could you please check this information using the spreadsheet view? Or with an interactive selection?

As @mwestphal suggest, it would be easier if you could share your dataset.

Best,

François

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lola\_Martin\_Alonso](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/lola_martin_alonso/32/15321_2.png) [@Lola\_Martin\_Alonso](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Lola_Martin_Alonso)
#### Post date: [October 10, 2024, 6:44am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527/4 "2024-10-10T06:44:44Z")

</div>

I have uploaded the data in wetransfer:

> **[Big files vtk](https://wetransfer.com/downloads/88713e7c25a1bbcdac55c09694ca4acb20241010045215/491e87?t_exp=1728795135&t_lsid=6aa2f330-f2a8-4a2c-b7a9-0bc110951a9b&t_s=download_link&t_ts=1728535935)**
>
> 2 files sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world

I have checked the spreadsheet values and it seems that there are some nan values for height\_in\_um but the same number from the beginning and the end of the points, that they could be the bottom and upper part that I have without data.

Could it be?

Thanks for you help @mwestphal @Francois_Mazen

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Francois\_Mazen](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/francois_mazen/32/6483_2.png) [@Francois\_Mazen](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Francois_Mazen)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2024, 8:28am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527/5 "2024-10-15T08:28:42Z")

</div>

Thanks for sharing the data, could you please also share your pvsm state file to reproduce the faulty rendering?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lola\_Martin\_Alonso](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/lola_martin_alonso/32/15321_2.png) [@Lola\_Martin\_Alonso](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Lola_Martin_Alonso)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2024, 8:43am UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527/6 "2024-10-15T08:43:35Z")

</div>

Of course, here it is the pvsm state.

Thanks for your time, @Francois_Mazen

[01\_TPMS\_1\_Crop\_state.pvsm](https://discourse.paraview.org/uploads/short-url/jcg8qmQQ4uEQ5QwBReciHq0EEOw.pvsm) (216.0 KB)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Francois\_Mazen](https://discourse.paraview.org/user_avatar/discourse.paraview.org/francois_mazen/32/6483_2.png) [@Francois\_Mazen](https://discourse.paraview.org/u/Francois_Mazen)
#### Post date: [October 15, 2024, 12:03pm UTC](https://discourse.paraview.org/t/problem-with-paraview-heavy-file/15527/7 "2024-10-15T12:03:34Z")

</div>

Looks like an issue in your data, all point values are -0.301593 for the upper part. You may need to check the code that generated the data.

 ![image](https://discourse.paraview.org/uploads/default/original/2X/8/8e6fec895886ea7d8c45043bdcd38acf4cdc69aa.png)

By the way, I would recommend to generate a polydata instead of a unstructured grid without cells. If not possible, you can convert in ParaView using the ConvertToPointCloud filter like in the screenshot above.

I hope this helps.

Best,

François
