Hello,
I am getting these warning since I updated from ParaView 6.2.0 RC1 to 6.2.0:
( 1.403s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd01787c980): No points read!
( 1.403s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd01787ae80): No points read!
( 1.404s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd01787ba80): No points read!
( 1.404s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017884480): No points read!
( 1.404s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017882f80): No points read!
( 1.404s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017880b80): No points read!
( 1.452s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017cb1080): No points read!
( 1.452s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017cb2580): No points read!
( 1.452s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017cb3a80): No points read!
( 1.453s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017cb4f80): No points read!
( 1.453s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017cb6480): No points read!
( 1.453s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017cb7980): No points read!
( 1.453s) [pvbatch.0 ] vtkPolyDataReader.cxx:267 WARN| vtkPolyDataReader (0x7cd017cb8e80): No points read!
These warning are thrown when using the PlotOverLine filter on an MPI distributed dataset (CFD code + ParaView Catalyst).
I suspect this is thrown by the filter on ranks that do not have data that intersects with the line.
This may not seem like a big deal, but in a ParaView Catalyst context, we are talking about hundreds of ranks throwing warnings to the screen log everytime Catalyst is called, which is potentially often. This renders the screen log almost unreadable.
If you confirm what I am saying, then I would consider this a regression and would appreciate a quick resolution. I do not think we can use ParaView 6.2 in this state.
Many thanks,
Alexandre