ParaView has a little known and little used streaming options, available in “Edit → Settings → Enable Streaming”.
Once enabled, some streaming are supposed to be available, however they have been forgotten for a while, so I’m trying to at least list what works and what doesn’t before we try to fix them (maybe).
Original implementation (2012)
-
Added the “EnableStreaming” option
-
Added a generic framework for streaming support within readers, filters and representations using the COMPOSITE_DATA_META_DATA key.
-
Implemented only in specific readers, filters and representations
- Readers: vtkXMLMultiBlockDataReader, vtkXMLUniformGridAMRReader, vtkAMRBaseReader (Flash, Enzo, Velodyne, AMReX)
- Filters: vtkAMRCutPlane, vtkAMRSliceFilter, vtkAMRResampleFilter, vtkCompositeCutter, vtkHierarchicalFractal, vtkPVExtractVOI
- Representations: vtkAMRStreamingVolumeRepresentation, vtkAMROutlineRepresentation
-
Status in 2026 of this implementation
- Compiled in CI on all platforms
- NOT tested in CI as it relies on a data not available in ParaView data (smooth.flash). This data is considered lost for now.
- Manual testing:
- vtkAMROutlineRepresentation with vtkXMLUniformGridAMRReader/vtkAMRFlashReader
- AMROutline is correctly visible
- streaming feature itself doesnt seems functional, as all blocks appears on first render.
- Streaming feature seems to break other rendering mode like surface
- vtkAMRStreamingVolumeRepresentation
- AMR Volume rendering is non-fonctional, with or without streaming
- https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/-/issues/23051
- Cannot evaluate streaming feature
- vtkAMROutlineRepresentation with vtkXMLUniformGridAMRReader/vtkAMRFlashReader
Streaming Particles plugin (2014/2016)
- Added a plugin using the Streaming feature
- Added a new “Streaming Particles” representation
- Rely on cosmo tools data for testing
- Status in 2026 of this implementation
- Partially compiled in CI because some parts (tests) require cosmotools to be enabled, it is not.
- NOT tested in CI because cosmo tools is not enabled
- Manual testing
- pv.StreamingParticles fails and the streaming feature itself doesn’t seem to work, no particles are loaded as we zoom in
- Another test just segfault when reading another cosmo data
Streaming Raytracing (2017)
- Adds a new option in OSPRay pathtracer: “Progressive Passes”
- Do not use the VTK pipeline at all, it is pure rendering.
- Status in 2026 of the implementation:
- Compiled in CI alongside OSPray
- NOT tested in CI at all, no tests for it in ParaView
- Actually works great!
- Edit → Settings → Enable Streaming → Restart
- Sphere, Apply
- Set Progressive Passes to 20
- Enjoy actual streaming of raytracing passes

Conclusion:
- Cosmotools stack seems unstable. It should be enabled in CI and tested thouroughly
- AMR Volume rendering is broken and should be fixed
- Streaming feature itself seems non-fonctionnal although it does something, it doesnt seem to do what the representation sink expect
- OSPray rendering streaming works