It has come to my attention that some Paraview users make use of extended character sets with non-utf8 locales, so I’m wondering how many people would object to this new requirement?
which introduce the constraint that all file and path names (and eventually all string data) passed to/from VTK are utf-8 encoded.
Once again, it is not clear to me where, in the code, is this requirement present. could you precise that ?
so I’m wondering how many people would object to this new requirement ?
Anyone without a UTF-8 locale will be impacted by the proposed change to ParaView.
Type locale -a in a terminal on linux to know.
On windows, the info is in the language settings.
Anyone using ANSI (128 char) file and path names will not be affected, regardless of their locale settings, since utf-8 encoding is identical to plain English text.
Great ! I missed this part ! GB232, which was historically used before GB 18030 did not support it.
There still must be user in China using GB232 but that may be fine to tell them to upgrade.